AI in Nephrology: A Comparative Analysis of Leading Large Language Models’ Efficacy in Medical Education and Patient Care

The article from NEJM AI, titled “Benchmarking Open-Source Large Language Models, GPT-4 and Claude 2 on Multiple-Choice Questions in Nephrology,” presents a comprehensive study comparing the performance of several large language models (LLMs) in the field of nephrology. Authored by Sean Wu, Michael Koo, Lesley Blum, Andy Black, Liyo Kao, Zhe Fei, Ph.D., Fabien Scalzo, Ph.D., and Ira Kurtz, M.D., the study focuses on evaluating these models’ capabilities in answering multiple-choice questions from the Nephrology Self-Assessment Program (nephSAP).

Key Insights from the Article:

1. Performance of LLMs in Nephrology: The study reveals significant differences in the performance of various LLMs, including open-source models like Llama2–70B, Koala 7B, Falcon 7B, Stable-Vicuna 13B, Orca-Mini 13B, and proprietary models like GPT-4 and Claude 2. GPT-4 outperformed other models with a success rate of 73.3% in answering nephSAP questions.

2. Implications for Medical Training and Patient Care: The findings highlight the potential of LLMs in medical training and patient care, especially in subspecialty fields like nephrology. However, the study also points out the knowledge gaps across different LLMs, emphasizing the need for further development and fine-tuning.

3. Methodology and Data Analysis: The study employed a rigorous methodology, utilizing a dataset of 858 nephSAP multiple-choice questions. It also involved a detailed analysis of the models’ reasoning abilities and the quality of their explanations, using metrics like BLEU and cosine similarity scores.

Call-to-Action:

• For Medical Professionals: Explore the potential of LLMs in enhancing medical education and patient interaction scenarios. Consider the implications of AI in subspecialty fields and how it can complement traditional training methods.
• For AI Researchers and Developers: Focus on improving the reasoning abilities and domain-specific knowledge of LLMs. Utilize the findings of this study to guide the development of more sophisticated and accurate models in the medical field.
• For Educators and Students: Leverage the capabilities of LLMs in educational settings, especially in complex subspecialty areas. Understand the limitations and strengths of these models to effectively integrate them into the learning process.

Conclusion:

The study from NEJM AI provides valuable insights into the capabilities and limitations of various LLMs in the field of nephrology. It underscores the importance of continuous improvement and domain-specific training for these models to enhance their applicability in medical education and patient care.

— -

📒 Compiled by — Sigrid Chen, Rehabilitation Medicine Resident Physician, Occupational Therapist, Personal Trainer of the American College of Sports Medicine.